In many countries "green" and "red" Biotechnology are condemned to insignificance. Banker spreak about a "declining branch of industry". In Germany there had been 2001 still nearly 15.000 employees in the Biotech-branch, 2006 only a few thousand. In 2014 Europe, especially Germany, is GMO-free. This concerns genetically modified crops as well as research. BASF, Bayer Crop Science and KWS send their Monsanto-friendly scientists to America. They think there are the best Monsanto-friendly scientists - in reallity they are the most decadent scientists. They honestly think to win the competition between always newly genetically modified crops and resitance. They try to outwit nature, but it doesn't work. [1][2]
Experts attest the Biotech-Industry, the connected scientists, lobbyists and authorities a totally lacking safety culture and a doubtful understanding of scientific nature:
Critics don't
need to support the retreat of "green" and "red" Biotechnology, the Biotech-Branch
together with its shady Lobbyists will fix it themselves.
Editors-in-chief like Thomas Deichmann contribute with strange aphorisms and klassical category-mistakes ("Green genetic engineering as a further developement of classical plantbreeding", "All GE-cash crops are safe"- FAZ 2007/# 20,p.8) as well as scientists of the honourable eight German scienceacademies ("no danger for environment", "safe for human being and animal" - FAZ 2007/# 19,p.36) or other Biotech-single-combatants like the indian Kameswara Rao and his "Foundation for Biotechnology Awareness and Education in Bangalore" or the ISAAA-website. Who really believes in such loan of nonsense today? The only thing you can be sure of, is, that they are all together able to supply us with excelent phrases useful for a battle of words. However, that's a pitiful science, if it is based on phrases! [3]
Further
reading and references:
[1]
Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung 2007, Nr. 3, p. 48
[2]
Api Review Letters 2014,
13, Nr.916 and Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung
2014, Nr. 241, p. 15
[3]
Science Review Letters 2007,
6, Nr.94
Online-Magazines:recently
published scientific research and practical advices on this topic can be
found in the quarterly magazine Apiculture
and Supplement Apicultural
Review Letters
as
well as in Natural Science and
Science
Review Letters
Genetically
Modified Seeds Cause More Harm Than Good I-VI. More...
Cancer
Caused By GMO's. More...
Genetically
Engineered Plants Or Animals In Landscape - Who Is Responsible For It,
Like Authorities Who Release The Rules, Can Be Taken To Court For It
Monsanto
And The GM-Crop Disaster
Biosafety?
Unscientific Assumptions The Basis Of Approvals? - Blatant Propaganda Exercise
Stands Validated As Exemplary Science - Toxic Genetically Engineered Foods
Could Have Been Approved.
Genetically
Modified Foods And Seeds Are Unhealthy And Unsafe - Evidence Links GM Foods
To Allergies
On
The Risks Of Agro-Biotechnology I-V - Negative Side Effects Of Genetically
Modified Crops On Honeybees
"Genetic
Engineering - Wrong In The Premises?"
Sign
up for bee-therapy | Beauty-cure
| Anti-aging
| Infertility
| Cancer
of the breast | Hashimoto-Thyreoiditis
|
Crohn's disease
Rheumatism
| Juvenile idiopathic
arthritis | Heart
diseases | Arteriosklerosis
| MS |
Diabetes
| Neurodermitis
| Obesity |
Depression
and Psychosis
Allergies
| Alzheimer
/ Parkinson | Diseases
of the kidneys | Pancreas
| how
to improve fitness of the body
Propolis
| Beeswax | Royal
Jelly | Organic Honey
| Comb in the Comb
| Raw Honey | Organic
Beekeeping Basic Course
Expertise
| Courses | Home
| Research | Save
Beecolonies-Bienenpatenschaft | Certification
| Training
Apitherapy